If your company is drifting toward insolvency and you are asking whether you can still take a salary, a dividend, or clear down the director’s loan, the honest answer is: sometimes yes, often no, and almost always under tighter scrutiny than most directors realise.

A payment that looked routine six months ago can still be challenged by a liquidator. The court can reverse it under section 238 or 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986, or order you personally to repay or contribute under section 212 or 214.

Two failings cause the trouble here: directors who documented nothing, and directors who did not realise their duties had shifted.

You can still be paid as the company enters the twilight zone, but not everything you pay yourself will survive a liquidator’s review. Some payments are ordinary. Some are recoverable from you personally, months later, when the money is long spent.

What follows is how we advise directors at first contact, as licensed insolvency practitioners at Company Debt, and it reflects what a liquidator will actually go looking for in your bank statements.

The Quick Answer for Directors

You can still pay yourself a reasonable salary for work genuinely performed, and you can reclaim legitimate business expenses. Everything else gets harder the closer the company moves to insolvency.

Dividends can only be paid out of distributable profits, and a company with no distributable reserves cannot lawfully pay one. Repaying your director’s loan account to yourself ahead of trade creditors is one of the fastest routes to a preference claim under section 239.

And if the company is already cash-flow insolvent, any payment to you will be examined against your duty to consider the interests of the company’s creditors, as set out in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25.

In short: if the company can meet its liabilities, your normal remuneration is broadly safe. If it cannot, your duties shift, and the protection of the corporate veil narrows sharply. We tell directors to stop thinking of themselves as shareholders from that point on, and start thinking like stewards of the creditors’ fund.

Why Twilight Zone Duties Bite Directors Hardest

The “twilight zone” is the period where a company is insolvent or likely to become insolvent but has not yet entered a formal procedure.

Under BTI v Sequana, the Supreme Court confirmed that the duty to consider the interests of creditors arises when the directors know, or ought to know, that the company is insolvent or bordering on insolvency, or that an insolvent liquidation or administration is probable.

The moment you know the company cannot pay its debts as they fall due, or its liabilities exceed its assets on a balance-sheet basis under section 123 of the Insolvency Act 1986, your duties have moved. Every payment you authorise from that point will be read against those duties.

The transition is easy to miss when you are in it. They see a bad month, a missed customer payment, a squeezed bank account, and they assume they can trade through. Sometimes they can.

But if the company later fails, the liquidator will not have the benefit of your optimism. They will have the bank statements, the filings, and the cashflow forecasts. They will ask whether a reasonable director in your position ought to have concluded that insolvency was probable. If the answer is yes, every director payment made after that date is on the table.

Salary Directors Can Still Take

A director taking a reasonable salary for work actually performed is usually on safe ground, even when the company is struggling. Salary is an expense of the business, not a distribution of profit, so the profit-reserves rules that govern dividends do not apply.

What the liquidator will test is whether the salary was (a) commercially reasonable for the role, (b) consistent with your historical pay pattern, and (c) processed through PAYE with proper tax and NIC deductions.

Where we see trouble is when directors suddenly increase their pay in the months before failure, or when they pay themselves a notional “salary” that was never run through payroll. Both patterns look like extraction to a liquidator.

Both can be attacked as transactions at an undervalue under section 238 if the company received significantly less in value than it paid out, unless the payment was made in good faith for the business with reasonable grounds to think it would benefit the company.

If your business is struggling and you need to take less, that usually helps your defence. If you need to take more to cover personal costs, you should be getting advice first.

Dividends Directors Cannot Lawfully Pay

Dividends are a common source of director liability. The rule is simple and inflexible: a company can only declare a dividend out of distributable profits, meaning accumulated realised profits less accumulated realised losses.

This is set out in Part 23 (sections 829 to 853) of the Companies Act 2006. If the company does not have the profits, any dividend declared is unlawful. A shareholder who knew or had reasonable grounds to believe it was unlawful can be made to repay it under section 847, and the directors who authorised it can be made to repay it personally for breach of duty.

Two pitfalls recur in the cases we handle. First, directors rely on last year’s signed accounts and assume the profits are still there, when in fact a loss-making year since has wiped them out.

If losses since the last annual accounts may have used up the profits, or those accounts do not show enough distributable profits, the dividend has to be justified by interim accounts that show distributable reserves exist at the date of payment.

Second, directors treat monthly dividends as a substitute for salary. This worked when the company was trading profitably. It stops working the moment profits evaporate, and the liquidator will reclassify each “dividend” as an unauthorised return of capital or a loan to the director.

If you have been taking regular dividends and neither your last annual accounts nor interim accounts show enough distributable reserves at each payment date, you should assume those payments will be challenged if the company goes into creditors’ voluntary liquidation or compulsory winding-up.

We routinely see directors surprised by this. Our advice is always the same: stop taking dividends the moment the profit picture becomes uncertain, and switch to a documented salary instead.

What Most Directors Miss

Most directors assume that paying tax on a dividend means it was lawfully declared. It was not. The tax you paid on a dividend has no bearing on whether the company had distributable reserves at the date of payment, and so no bearing on whether the dividend was lawful under the Companies Act 2006.

A dividend drawn when no distributable reserves existed is an unlawful distribution regardless of what you paid to HMRC. You can be ordered to repay the unlawful part of the dividend to the company, which may be all of it. Whether you can recover any of the tax you paid on it is a separate question for your tax adviser.

Directors who took regular monthly dividends for years without maintaining interim accounts to confirm reserves are the ones who discover this on the day the liquidator’s letter arrives.

Loan Account Repayments to Directors

This is the single most dangerous payment a director can make in the twilight zone. If you are owed money by the company (a credit balance on the director’s loan account) and you decide to pay yourself back ahead of trade creditors or HMRC, you are almost certainly preferring yourself within the meaning of section 239.

The clawback window is two years for connected parties, which includes directors. The liquidator does not have to prove the company intended to prefer you, because the law presumes it, though you can try to show otherwise. The liquidator must still show that the company was insolvent and that you received more than you would have done in the liquidation.

The mirror problem is a debit balance. If you owe the company money, the liquidator will demand it back from you personally. Separately, the company may owe HMRC a section 455 corporation tax charge on the overdrawn loan. That is the company’s tax bill, not a debt you owe.

We have seen directors blindsided by this on day one of a CVL, discovering that they owe the company tens of thousands of pounds they thought were “just paperwork.” A debit DLA is not paperwork. It is a debt you owe the creditors, and the liquidator will pursue you for it.

If you are approaching insolvency with a debit balance, get advice on how to address it before the process begins. More on the mechanics in our guide to the director’s loan account in liquidation.

Expenses Directors Can Still Reclaim

Reclaiming genuine business expenses remains legitimate even as the company heads toward insolvency, provided the expenses are real, documented, and incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The test is the same one HMRC applies.

What gets directors into trouble is the grey area: the family meal treated as client entertainment, the personal phone bill run through the company, the home office claim with no supporting calculation. These get reversed routinely when a liquidator goes through the expense claims.

Our rule for directors in the twilight zone is simple: keep receipts for everything, stop any expense that would embarrass you in a liquidator’s interview, and never backdate claims. A liquidator looking at a company in difficulty will focus on the six months before formal insolvency, and expense reimbursements to directors are one of the first categories they test.

Redundancy Claims Available to Directors

If you are an employee of the company as well as a director, which most owner-managers are, you may have a statutory claim for redundancy, unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay when the company enters liquidation.

These are paid by the Insolvency Service’s Redundancy Payments Service from the National Insurance Fund, up to statutory limits, and they are a legitimate recovery for a director who has genuinely worked in the business.

To claim you need to have been an employee under a contract of employment, which PAYE records help to prove. Redundancy pay also needs at least two years of continuous service, but unpaid wages, holiday pay and notice pay do not. What the claim is worth depends on your age, length of service and weekly pay, capped at £751 a week.

We flag this because directors in financial distress often do not realise they may be entitled to anything at all. It is not “taking money from the company.” It is a statutory employee entitlement that sits alongside the insolvency process. Our team handles redundancy claims as part of our CVL work, and in most cases the money comes through within six to eight weeks of appointment.

Six Clawback Provisions Directors Should Know

If the liquidator believes a payment to you was improper, they have a toolkit of statutory provisions to reverse it and recover the money from you personally. Six matter most:

  • Section 238 (transactions at undervalue). Can catch payments or asset transfers where the company received nothing, or significantly less than it gave, in the two years before insolvency, unless made in good faith for the business with reasonable grounds to think it would benefit the company.
  • Section 239 (preferences). Can catch payments that put one creditor (including you) in a better position than they would have been in the liquidation, where the company wanted to prefer them. For a director that wish is presumed, though it can be rebutted. Two-year lookback for connected parties.
  • Section 214 (wrongful trading). If you knew, or ought to have concluded, there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation or administration, you can be ordered to contribute to the company’s assets personally, unless you took every step to minimise creditors’ losses.
  • Section 212 (misfeasance). A summary remedy the liquidator can use against directors who have misapplied company money or breached fiduciary duty. Often used alongside section 214.
  • Sections 213 and 246ZA (fraudulent trading). Reserved for the worst cases, where the business was carried on with intent to defraud creditors. Carries both civil and criminal consequences.
  • Section 423 (transactions defrauding creditors). No fixed look-back period, though the claim must still be brought within the usual limitation period. Captures asset transfers made to put property beyond the reach of actual or future creditors.

Our view is that directors do not need to memorise the statute. They need to understand the pattern: the closer the payment to the formal insolvency date, the more carefully it will be examined, and the higher the risk that it will be reversed and recovered from them personally. See our guide on wrongful trading for the director-liability side.

Timing Checkpoints Before Liquidation

The calendar matters more than most directors realise. We walk clients through four checkpoints:

  1. Before insolvency is probable. Normal remuneration is broadly safe. Keep documentation, process through PAYE, and ensure dividends are supported by interim accounts showing distributable reserves.
  2. Twilight zone (insolvency probable but not inevitable). Duty to creditors arises. Review every director payment. Stop dividends unless distributable reserves are certain. Document every decision in board minutes.
  3. Insolvency inevitable. Stop all non-essential payments to directors. Take advice from a licensed insolvency practitioner before making any payment. Section 127 will apply from the petition date if the route is compulsory liquidation.
  4. After formal insolvency begins. The insolvency practitioner controls the estate. Director authority ends. Any prior payments in the relevant lookback period are open to challenge.

Our advice at checkpoint two is always the same: get a second opinion, in writing, from a licensed IP before you take anything. It costs you nothing, and it may save you tens of thousands in clawback later.

Patterns Liquidators Flag in Director Pay

When we are appointed as liquidator, our investigation into director payments follows a consistent pattern. We pull the bank statements for the period the lookback allows, which is two years for connected-party transactions.

We reconcile every director payment against payroll records, the loan account ledger, declared dividends, and supporting board minutes. We test the company’s solvency at the date of each payment by reconstructing a rough balance sheet and cashflow position. And we compare the pattern of director payments with the pattern of creditor payments over the same window.

Where the pattern is clean, the director walks away. Where directors were paid smoothly while HMRC and trade creditors were held off, we flag a preference. Where dividends were paid without accounts showing enough distributable reserves, we flag an unlawful distribution. Where salary spiked in the final months, we flag a transaction at undervalue.

Then we write to the director setting out the findings and giving them an opportunity to respond before we pursue recovery. A well-advised director can often settle these claims for a fraction of the face value, but only if they have the records to prove their case.

Common Myths Directors Bring to First Calls

“It’s my company, I can pay myself what I like.” Only while the company is solvent. The moment insolvency becomes probable, your duties shift and your freedom narrows. This is the clearest effect of BTI v Sequana.

“I already paid tax on the dividend, so it’s mine.” The tax status of the dividend in your hands is separate from whether it was lawfully declared. If the company had no distributable reserves, the dividend is unlawful and you can be ordered to repay it regardless of your personal tax position.

“I’ll just repay my director’s loan before anyone notices.” The liquidator will notice. Bank statements show everything, and the section 239 lookback for connected parties is two years. Clearing a credit DLA in the run-up to insolvency is one of the most attackable payments a director can make.

“Expenses don’t matter, they’re only small.” They matter because they signal intent. A pattern of personal costs run through the company in the months before failure tells the liquidator more about director conduct than any single large payment.

Director Checklist Before You Pay Yourself

  • Can the company pay its other debts as they fall due? If not, insolvency is probable and your duties have shifted.
  • Is the payment salary, and is it reasonable for the role you perform?
  • If it is a dividend, do you hold signed interim accounts at the payment date showing distributable reserves?
  • If it is a DLA repayment, are you being paid ahead of trade creditors or HMRC? If so, stop.
  • If it is an expense reimbursement, is the expense documented, receipted, and genuinely business-related?
  • Have you documented the decision in a board minute? If not, do it now.
  • Have you taken advice from a licensed insolvency practitioner? If insolvency is probable, you should.

Do

  • Continue a reasonable salary processed through PAYE for work you are actually performing
  • Maintain signed interim accounts before each dividend to confirm distributable reserves exist at the payment date
  • Document every director payment decision in contemporaneous board minutes
  • Get written advice from a licensed IP the moment insolvency becomes probable
  • Keep receipts for all expense claims and apply the business-purpose test honestly

Don’t

  • Increase your salary or take a backdated pay rise in the months before formal insolvency
  • Declare dividends when you cannot produce interim accounts showing the profits exist
  • Repay a credit director’s loan account while HMRC arrears or trade creditor debts are outstanding
  • Run personal expenses through the company and rely on them going unnoticed in a liquidator review
  • Assume that paying income tax on a dividend confirms it was lawfully declared

FAQs on Director Pay Before Liquidation

Can I take a salary right up until the company enters liquidation?

Can I still take a dividend if I am worried about insolvency?

Is repaying my director’s loan before liquidation a preference?

What happens if my director’s loan account is overdrawn?

Can I claim redundancy as a director?

What is the twilight zone and when does it start?

How far back can a liquidator look at payments I took?

What should I do if I have already taken a payment I am worried about?

Are director expenses still claimable while the company is insolvent?

Company Position Check

First, Check the Company’s Financial Position

This test does not assess your personal liability. It can help show how serious the company’s position may be and how quickly action could be needed.

Check my company’s position

Estimates are fineWe only call if you ask us to

Related Guides