Chris is an Insolvency Practitioner regulated by the ICAEW since 2014,.
He is experienced in contentious insolvency with excellent analytical skills and strong knowledge of both general and technical insolvency matters.
Company administration is a formal insolvency procedure, often considered by businesses under severe financial distress, such as when facing relentless creditor pressure or a critical cash-flow crisis.
It offers a protective moratorium, halting creditor actions and providing breathing space to explore rescue options. This legal process allows an appointed insolvency practitioner to manage the company to preserve its value, safeguard jobs, and maximise returns for creditors.
Directors typically consider administration when they need immediate relief from financial pressures and wish to avoid liquidation, which could lead to the company’s closure.
Defining Company Administration in UK Insolvency Law
Company administration in the UK is a formal insolvency procedure governed by the Insolvency Act 1986 and Schedule B1. It aims to provide a “breathing space” for financially distressed companies, allowing an appointed administrator to manage the company’s affairs and pursue statutory objectives. Unlike liquidation, which involves winding up the company, administration focuses on preserving value and potentially rescuing the business.
The statutory objectives under Schedule B1 are hierarchical. The primary goal is to rescue the company as a going concern. If this is not feasible, the administrator aims to achieve a better outcome for creditors than immediate liquidation would offer. Finally, if neither of these objectives is achievable, the administrator will realise assets to distribute funds to secured or preferential creditors.
An administrator takes control of the company upon appointment, acting in the interests of all creditors. They have extensive powers, including managing business operations and making critical decisions without director interference. This process is overseen by the court, ensuring that creditor protections are upheld.
Key legal elements include:
Court oversight of the administration process.
Protection from creditor actions during a statutory moratorium.
An administrator’s duty to act quickly and efficiently.
By focusing on business rescue rather than asset liquidation, administration offers a structured approach to navigating financial distress while aiming to maximise returns for creditors.
expert advice is a click away
Speak with a business restructuring and insolvency expert via live chat right now, or call us on 0800 074 6757. A first consultation is entirely free, and always confidential.
When to Consider Administration and Why It Matters
Considering administration is crucial when your company faces persistent creditor threats, severe cash-flow problems, or the risk of legal action. These scenarios often indicate that the business is unable to meet its financial obligations, making administration a viable option. A key benefit of entering administration is the statutory moratorium, which restricts most creditor enforcement actions and provides breathing space to explore rescue or restructuring options. This protection allows the company to stabilise without the immediate threat of individual creditor action.
Timing is critical in deciding to enter administration. Acting early can preserve more options for rescuing the business. The hierarchical objectives of administration, as outlined in Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986, prioritise rescuing the company as a going concern. Where this is not achievable, the objective shifts to achieving a better result for creditors as a whole than would be likely on an immediate liquidation. This statutory focus often makes administration preferable to liquidation, which commonly results in the cessation of the company’s business.
For example, a retail company facing imminent liquidation due to creditor pressure may enter administration to allow debts to be restructured and trading to continue under the administrator’s control. By acting promptly, directors can avoid immediate compulsory liquidation and improve the prospects of preserving jobs and business value.
If your company is under severe financial strain, considering administration early can preserve more strategic options and improve outcomes for creditors and the business.
Key Risks and Consequences for Directors
As a director of a company that is insolvent or likely to become insolvent, you face significant risks if you delay action or mismanage the situation. In these circumstances, directors must have proper regard to the interests of creditors. Failure to do so can expose you to serious consequences, including wrongful trading, personal liability, and disqualification.
Wrongful trading arises where directors continue to trade when they knew, or ought to have concluded, that there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation or administration. This can result in an order to make a personal contribution to the company’s assets. Fraudulent trading is more serious and involves carrying on business with the intent to defraud creditors; it can give rise to unlimited personal liability and criminal sanctions.
Directors may also face disqualification for up to 15 years if found guilty of unfit conduct under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986. During administration, the administrator is required to review the director’s conduct and report to the Insolvency Service, which may investigate issues such as preferential payments or transactions at an undervalue.
To mitigate these risks, early professional advice is essential. Acting promptly and responsibly helps directors comply with their legal duties and reduce the likelihood of personal consequences.
Available Routes into Administration
Understanding the available routes into administration can help you make informed decisions during financial distress. There are three primary pathways: court order, out-of-court appointment by directors or the company, and appointment by a qualifying floating charge holder (QFCH).
Court Order
An administration order can be sought by the company, its directors, or a creditor. This route involves an application to the court, which must be satisfied that the company is insolvent or likely to become insolvent and that the administration order is reasonably likely to achieve one of the statutory purposes set out in Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986. This pathway is commonly used where there are disputes, where an out-of-court route is unavailable, or where a creditor seeks the court’s intervention.
Out-of-Court Appointment by Directors or the Company
Directors, or the company itself, may make an out-of-court appointment of an administrator, which is generally quicker and less costly than a court application. This process may involve filing a notice of intention to appoint an administrator, which creates an interim moratorium, followed by a notice of appointment. Directors must state that the company is insolvent or likely to become insolvent. This route is often chosen for its speed and efficiency, allowing action without a full court hearing.
Qualifying Floating Charge Holder (QFCH) Appointment
A QFCH, typically a lender holding a qualifying floating charge over substantially all of the company’s assets, may appoint an administrator once its security has become enforceable. This appointment is made out of court in accordance with the terms of the security and statutory requirements. It does not depend on a separate court determination of insolvency, but it is not automatic and must follow the prescribed procedure.
In situations involving disputes or where statutory conditions for out-of-court appointment are not met, a court application will be required. Understanding these routes helps ensure the most appropriate option is selected for the company’s circumstances.
How the Moratorium Protects the Business
The statutory moratorium provides important protection when a company enters administration by restricting most creditor actions and giving the company breathing space to pursue rescue or restructuring options. During this period, creditors cannot commence or continue legal proceedings, enforce security, or repossess goods without the consent of the administrator or the permission of the court. This allows the administrator to formulate proposals without the immediate threat of enforcement.
Key restrictions on creditors during the moratorium include:
No enforcement of security over company property without consent or court permission
No new or continued legal proceedings against the company without consent or court permission
No repossession of goods under hire-purchase or retention of title agreements without consent or court permission
No landlord’s forfeiture by peaceable re-entry without consent or court permission
This protection helps stabilise the company’s position and supports collective decision-making for the benefit of creditors as a whole. However, continued trading during administration depends on the availability of funding, as the moratorium itself does not provide finance. Directors should therefore act promptly while ensuring that sufficient liquidity exists to support the administration process.
The Administration Timeline, Proposals, and Creditor Involvement
Once an administrator is appointed, they must act swiftly to stabilise the company and engage with creditors. The process begins with notifying all known creditors of the appointment and the administration’s initiation. The administrator has up to eight weeks from the appointment to prepare a detailed statement of proposals, outlining strategies for achieving administration objectives, unless the court grants an extension. This proposal must be shared with the Registrar of Companies, creditors, and company members.
Creditor involvement is crucial. Creditors are given the opportunity to request a qualifying decision procedure to approve or reject the proposals, which may include virtual meetings or electronic voting. If creditors holding at least 10% in value of the company’s creditors do not request a decision procedure, the proposals are deemed approved. However, if a decision procedure is requested and the proposals are rejected, the administrator must take further steps in accordance with Schedule B1, which may include applying to the court or proposing an alternative course of action, rather than an automatic winding-up.
The administrator’s duty is to act quickly and fairly, ensuring that decisions benefit all creditors collectively. Creditors can challenge decisions they perceive as unfair through court applications. The timeline typically follows these steps: appointment → proposals → creditor decision (or deemed approval) → potential outcomes such as company rescue or liquidation. This structured approach aims to maximise returns for creditors while preserving viable business elements.
Pre-Pack Administration Basics
Pre-pack administration involves arranging the sale of a business or its assets before formally appointing an administrator, with the sale completing immediately upon appointment. This approach offers several advantages, such as speed, preservation of brand value, and continuity for employees. However, it is not without controversy, particularly regarding sales to connected parties like former directors or shareholders.
The process is governed by Statement of Insolvency Practice 16 (SIP 16), which requires administrators to provide a detailed report to creditors as soon as reasonably practicable after the sale, rather than within a fixed statutory timeframe. This report must include the transaction details, the marketing process, valuations obtained, and reasons for choosing a pre-pack as the best option for creditors.
Additionally, the Administration (Restrictions on Disposal etc. to Connected Persons) Regulations 2021 mandate that any substantial disposal to connected parties within the first eight weeks of administration requires either creditor approval or an independent evaluator’s report.
Key points include:
Advantages: Quick execution, brand value preservation, and employee retention.
Controversies: Lack of transparency in connected party sales.
SIP 16 Requirements: Detailed reporting to creditors after the sale.
Connected Party Regulations: Independent evaluation or creditor approval needed for sales to connected parties.
Understanding these elements helps ensure that pre-pack administrations are conducted transparently and in the best interests of all stakeholders involved.
Effects on Employees, Creditors, and Shareholders
In a company administration, the distribution of assets follows a strict order of priority. Secured creditors with fixed charges are paid from the proceeds of their secured assets, subject to certain limited costs of realisation. Insolvency practitioner fees and expenses relating to the administration are paid as expenses of the administration, ahead of floating charge realisations. Ordinary preferential creditors, including employees for unpaid wages and holiday pay subject to statutory caps, come next. HMRC holds secondary preferential status for certain tax debts, which can impact recoveries for other creditors. Floating charge holders and unsecured creditors follow, with shareholders typically last in line, often receiving little to no return if the company’s assets are insufficient.
Employees face specific considerations during administration. The administrator has 14 days to decide whether to adopt employment contracts; failure to do so may lead to redundancy claims. If contracts are adopted, wages and salary liabilities arising after adoption become an expense of the administration. The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE) may apply if the business is sold as a going concern, potentially transferring employees to the new owner.
For shareholders, administration usually means minimal returns unless all creditor claims are satisfied. However, successful administration can preserve jobs and business continuity. Conversely, if administration fails, liquidation often follows, leading to job losses and asset dissolution. Understanding these dynamics helps you navigate the complexities of administration effectively.
Your Next Step
To effectively navigate the complexities of company administration, it is crucial to seek professional advice early. Engaging with a licensed insolvency practitioner can provide tailored guidance on whether administration or another procedure best suits your situation. This proactive step not only maximises the potential for rescuing your business but also helps mitigate personal risks associated with insolvency.
Early dialogue ensures that you understand all available options and can make informed decisions that protect your responsibilities and business interests. Contact a licensed insolvency practitioner today to explore the most suitable path forward for your company.
Company Administration FAQs
Does a director remain in office during administration?
Yes, directors remain in office during administration, but their powers are significantly curtailed. The appointed administrator takes control of the company’s affairs, and directors cannot make management decisions without the administrator’s consent. This ensures that the administrator can act in the best interests of creditors.
Are personal guarantees triggered when a company enters administration?
Personal guarantees may be triggered when a company enters administration, depending on the terms of the guarantee. Creditors holding personal guarantees might pursue directors or guarantors for payment if the company cannot meet its obligations.
What if the company cannot afford to continue trading under administration?
If a company cannot afford to continue trading under administration, the administrator may decide to cease trading and move towards asset realisation. This could lead to liquidation if rescuing the business as a going concern is not feasible.
Can a business exit administration and continue trading normally?
A business can exit administration and continue trading normally if it is successfully restructured or sold as a going concern. The administrator will aim to achieve this outcome if it offers the best return for creditors.
How does a pre-pack sale differ from liquidation?
A pre-pack sale involves arranging the sale of a business or its assets before entering administration, with the sale completed immediately upon appointment. In contrast, liquidation involves winding up the company and distributing its assets to creditors, often resulting in the cessation of business operations.
Do employees always transfer to a new owner under TUPE?
Under TUPE (Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations), employees generally transfer to a new owner with their existing terms and conditions when a business is sold as a going concern. However, certain insolvency-related modifications can apply in administration, particularly where the aim is business rescue.
Must suppliers continue supplying during administration?
Suppliers are generally required to continue supplying during administration if they provide goods or services under contracts caught by insolvency termination protections, unless the administrator agrees otherwise or the court permits termination. Payment for ongoing supply is required as an expense of the administration.
Is there a minimum debt threshold to use administration?
There is no minimum debt threshold for entering administration. The decision is based on whether it is likely to achieve better outcomes for creditors than other insolvency procedures, regardless of the debt amount.
Does administration impact future directorships?
Administration itself does not automatically impact future directorships unless misconduct is found during an investigation into director conduct. Directors may face disqualification if found guilty of wrongful trading or other breaches.
How long does the administration process usually last?
Administration typically lasts up to one year but can be extended with creditor consent or court approval if more time is needed to achieve statutory objectives.
What happens if creditors reject the administrator’s proposals?
If creditors reject the administrator’s proposals, the administrator must consider alternative steps permitted under Schedule B1, which may include applying to court or proposing a different course of action, rather than an automatic winding-up.
Will the administrator investigate director conduct in every case?
Yes, an investigation into director conduct is mandatory in every case of administration. The administrator must report findings to the Insolvency Service, which assesses whether further action is warranted against directors for any misconduct identified.
