With almost four decades of experience in business, Mike Smith is one of the founders of Company Debt and one of the UK’s most experienced mediators with HMRC.
Having previously owned several of his own successful companies and occupied senior roles as a director within both Legal and General and Sun Alliance during separate periods of his career, Mike founded Company Debt with a genuine desire to help stressed directors in challenging circumstances. He is also an expert in the alternative finance sector.
Welcome to our comprehensive guide on UK insolvency news. This article provides you with the latest updates on insolvency developments, policy changes, and emerging trends.
We understand the pressures you face when navigating complex financial landscapes and legal obligations.
Our goal is to offer clear, authoritative insights that help you stay informed and compliant while addressing any concerns you may have about the evolving insolvency environment.
Whether you’re seeking reassurance or strategic guidance, we’re here to support your journey.
The UK insolvency landscape is currently marked by a high volume of company failures, reflecting ongoing economic pressures. Directors increasingly opt for Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidations (CVLs) as a proactive measure to manage non-viable businesses, with CVLs making up a significant portion of insolvencies. This trend underscores the challenging environment many directors face as they navigate financial distress and creditor demands.
Recent developments highlight a shift towards more formal restructuring processes. While CVLs and compulsory liquidations have seen a slight decline, there has been an uptick in Administrations, indicating that larger companies are seeking structured solutions rather than immediate closure. This suggests that financial pressures are mounting on complex entities, pushing them towards formal restructuring to manage their obligations.
Key trends include rising creditor enforcement actions and increased scrutiny under new transparency mandates. The implementation of mandatory identity verification under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 is set to impact over 7 million directors, adding another layer of compliance for businesses to manage. These factors collectively illustrate a landscape where directors must stay informed and prepared to adapt to evolving challenges.
Policy Shifts and Legislative Reforms
Recent changes in UK insolvency and corporate governance laws are reshaping the landscape for company directors. The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCT Act) introduces mandatory identity verification for directors, effective from 18 November 2025. This requirement aims to enhance transparency and combat economic crime. Directors must complete this verification within a 12-month transition period, typically during their annual confirmation statement filing[1]Trusted Source – GOV.UK – Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023.
The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA) also continues to influence restructuring practices. It introduced new tools like moratoriums and restructuring plans, giving companies more flexibility to navigate financial distress. These measures are particularly relevant as the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Bilta case has broadened fraudulent trading liability under section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986[2]Trusted Source – SUPREMECOURT.UK – Bilta (UK) Ltd and others (Respondents) v Tradition Financial Services Ltd.
These reforms underscore the importance of compliance and proactive management for directors. Staying informed about these changes is crucial to mitigate risks and ensure that companies remain on the right side of the law.
Notable Insolvency Cases and Court Rulings
Understanding significant insolvency cases can help you navigate potential legal challenges. One landmark case is the Supreme Court’s decision in Bilta (UK) Ltd v Tradition Financial Services Ltd. This ruling expanded the scope of fraudulent trading liability under section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986, clarifying that not only directors but also third parties who knowingly participate in fraudulent activities can be held liable. This precedent underscores the importance of due diligence for anyone engaging with financially distressed companies.
Another notable case involved the restructuring of Carillion plc, which highlighted the complexities of handling large-scale corporate failures. The case demonstrated the critical role of government and stakeholders in managing insolvency to minimise economic disruption.
These cases illustrate the evolving legal landscape surrounding insolvency, emphasising the need for directors to stay informed about their responsibilities and potential liabilities. By understanding these precedents, you can better prepare for and manage insolvency risks within your company.
Sectoral Trends and Key Risk Indicators
The construction, retail, and accommodation sectors are currently the most vulnerable to insolvency in the UK. Each faces distinct pressures that heighten their risk profiles:
Construction: With 3,934 insolvencies recorded in the 12 months leading to September 2025, this sector leads in failures, accounting for 17% of all industry cases. The volatility in input costs, such as labour, energy, and materials, has eroded margins, particularly impacting subcontractors and smaller developers.
Retail and Wholesale Trade: This sector saw 3,710 insolvencies (16% of the total). Retailers are grappling with high operating expenses like business rates and energy costs and reduced consumer spending due to persistent inflation.
Accommodation and Food Services: With 3,365 insolvencies (14%), this sector is highly sensitive to consumer confidence. Rising costs, especially in labour and B2B services, are squeezing margins.
Nearly half of UK SMEs also report critical cash flow issues driven by increasing costs and late payments. While credit availability has improved slightly, underlying liquidity distress remains a significant precursor to insolvency.
Insolvency Insights Across the UK
Insolvency trends across the UK reveal distinct regional characteristics.
In England and Wales, the insolvency rate stood at 52.5 per 10,000 companies as of July 2025, the highest rate in the UK. The prevalence of Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidations (CVLs) also remains high, with 1,583 cases in July 2025 alone, accounting for 76% of all insolvencies[3]Trusted Source – GOV.UK – Company Insolvencies, July 2025. This suggests that many businesses voluntarily wind down operations due to unsustainable debt levels rather than waiting for creditor action.
Similarly, Scotland’s insolvency rate stood at 51.4 per 10,000 companies as of July 2025, though showing a decrease from the previous year. This rate aligns closely with England and Wales, yet Scotland sees a higher proportion of compulsory liquidations, indicating a more immediate enforcement approach by creditors.
In contrast, Northern Ireland maintains the lowest insolvency rate at 36.9 per 10,000, reflecting regional economic resilience and potentially more lenient creditor practices.
The use of new restructuring tools under the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 remains limited in both Scotland and Northern Ireland, highlighting a cautious adoption of recent legislative changes. Understanding these regional differences is crucial for directors navigating insolvency risks in these areas.
Emerging Challenges and Compliance Obligations
New compliance obligations are arising for company directors, notably the mandatory identity verification under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023. Starting from 18 November 2025, all new directors and Persons with Significant Control (PSCs) must verify their identity. Existing directors, estimated at over 7 million, will have a 12-month transition period to comply. Failure to meet these requirements could lead to significant consequences, including the inability to file essential documents and potential disqualification.
Additionally, the scope of fraudulent trading liability has expanded following the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Bilta case. This decision extends liability beyond directors to third parties involved in fraudulent activities, necessitating increased due diligence for all business transactions.
To navigate these challenges:
Ensure timely ID verification: Begin preparations now to meet the November deadline.
Review trading practices: Conduct thorough checks on business partners to avoid inadvertent liability.
Stay informed: Regularly update your knowledge on regulatory changes to maintain compliance.
These steps are crucial for safeguarding your company and personal standing amidst evolving legal landscapes.
Forecast and Future Outlook
The UK insolvency landscape is expected to remain challenging as time goes on, with a high volume of company failures anticipated to persist.
Looking ahead, the construction sector is likely to continue facing high insolvency rates due to ongoing cost pressures. The Supreme Court’s recent expansion of fraudulent trading liability under the Bilta ruling means directors and third parties must exercise increased diligence in transactions to avoid legal repercussions.
Key dates include the release of September 2025 insolvency data on 17 October 2025, which will indicate whether the current trend of high CVLs continues. Additionally, the Bank of England’s Credit Conditions Survey results at the end of November will provide insights into corporate credit availability, which is crucial for assessing future insolvency risks. You should prepare for these changes by ensuring compliance and seeking expert advice where necessary.
Action Steps for Company Directors
To stay compliant and address potential insolvency issues early, directors of UK limited companies should follow these practical steps:
Understand Your Financial Position: Review your company’s financial health regularly. Monitor cash flow, profit margins, and outstanding debts to identify potential issues early.
Stay Informed on Legislation: Familiarise yourself with recent changes in insolvency laws and corporate governance, such as the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023.
Engage with Professional Advisors: If you suspect financial distress, consult with insolvency practitioners or legal advisors. Early advice can provide options like restructuring or voluntary liquidation, potentially avoiding compulsory liquidation.
Communicate with Creditors: Maintain open lines of communication with creditors. Proactively discussing payment plans can prevent enforcement actions like winding-up petitions.
Implement Strong Governance Practices: Ensure your company complies with all regulatory requirements. This includes filing accurate confirmation statements and maintaining transparent records.
By taking these steps, you can mitigate risks, maintain compliance, and navigate insolvency challenges more effectively.
FAQs
What should directors do if they suspect their company is insolvent?
If you suspect insolvency, act swiftly to minimise potential liabilities. Cease trading immediately to prevent worsening the financial situation. Consult an insolvency practitioner to assess your company’s position and explore options like restructuring or voluntary liquidation. Document all decisions and seek legal advice to ensure compliance with directors’ duties.
How does the economic climate affect my potential risk of insolvency?
Economic conditions like inflation and slowed growth can increase insolvency risks by squeezing margins and reducing demand. The construction sector, for example, has seen high insolvency rates due to cost pressures. Monitoring economic indicators helps anticipate financial challenges and take proactive measures.
Can I dissolve my company as an alternative to formal insolvency?
Dissolving a company is not a substitute for formal insolvency procedures if debts remain unpaid. Voluntary dissolution is only appropriate for solvent companies with no outstanding liabilities. Insolvent companies must follow formal processes like liquidation to address creditor claims legally.
What is the role of an insolvency practitioner, and when should I consult one?
Insolvency practitioners guide companies through financial distress, offering solutions like restructuring or liquidation. Consult one early if you suspect insolvency or face creditor pressure. Their expertise helps navigate complex legal obligations and protect your interests during challenging times.
How do I handle a winding-up petition served against my company?
Respond promptly to a winding-up petition by seeking legal advice immediately. You may need to negotiate with creditors or contest the petition if it’s unjustified. Failure to act can lead to compulsory liquidation, so addressing the issue quickly is vital.
Is personal liability automatic if I am a director of an insolvent company?
Personal liability isn’t automatic but can arise from wrongful trading or failing to fulfil fiduciary duties. Directors must act in the company’s best interest, especially when facing insolvency. Compliance with legal obligations reduces the risk of personal liability.
What are common misconceptions about director liability?
A common misconception is that limited liability protects directors from all personal risks. In reality, directors can be held personally accountable for wrongful trading or breaches of duty. Understanding these liabilities helps avoid costly mistakes and ensures responsible governance.
How do new identity verification requirements affect day-to-day operations?
The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 mandates identity verification for directors, impacting daily operations by introducing additional compliance tasks. Directors must verify their identity as part of annual filings, which could require adjustments in administrative processes to ensure timely compliance and avoid penalties.
Will mandatory ID verification apply to existing directors or just new appointees?
Mandatory ID verification applies to both new appointees and existing directors. From 18 November 2025, all directors must complete this process within a 12-month transition period. This requirement aims to enhance transparency and prevent economic crime.
How do policy changes under the ECCT Act impact small businesses differently from large ones?
The ECCT Act’s ID verification requirements pose significant compliance challenges for small businesses lacking dedicated legal teams. While large companies may absorb these changes more easily, SMEs must allocate resources carefully to meet new obligations without disrupting operations.
References
The primary sources for this article are listed below, including the relevant laws and Acts which provide their legal basis.
You can learn more about our standards for producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy here.
